Why Should Prosecutors "Seek Justice"?
نویسنده
چکیده
This article discusses how prosecutors should conduct themselves in light of the principle that has traditionally ben thought to define the prosecutor’s professional ethos: “the duty to seek justice.” Part I sketches the outlines of this concept, both historically and in its contemporary incarnation. Part II offers two reasons for asking why prosecutors should seek justice. Part III examines alternative justifications for the duty–first, that the duty derives from prosecutors’ extraordinary power, and second, that the duty derives from their role on behalf of a sovereign whose own interest is in achieving justice–and explains why the second provides the more complete justification. Finally, Part IV suggests how this understanding of the defining principle of prosecutorial ethics has implications in cases where prosecutors have convicted innocent individuals, even if in-
منابع مشابه
PROSECUTORS ’ PROFESSIONAL INDEPENDENCE Reflections on Garcetti v . Ceballos By Bruce
What does it mean for prosecutors to seek justice? How independent should prosecutors be in endeavoring to seek justice? And how should their professional independence be secured? These fundamental questions lie beneath the surface of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Garcetti v. Ceballos, 126 S. Ct. 1951 (2006). The case arose out of a lawsuit filed by Richard Ceballos, a deputy district ...
متن کاملRules, Resources, and Relationships: Contextual Constraints on Prosecutorial Decision Making
In the American criminal justice system, prosecuting attorneys arguably enjoy broader discretion than any other system actor. Research, however, is beginning to show that prosecutorial discretion is not nearly as unconstrained as initially thought. Relying on in-depth interviews and surveys of prosecutors in two large urban/suburban county prosecutors’ offices, this article examines prosecutors...
متن کاملCitizenship and justice: public prosecutors in social contexts in Portugal
All over the world judicial systems are under tremendous pressure as the instruments used by citizens to access their full rights. The erosion of other state powers has transferred expectations of social intervention or, at least, protection for the rights of the weak and vulnerable, to the sphere of justice. Hence, in some countries the social role of judges or public prosecutors has become mo...
متن کاملRacial Disparities in the Allocation of Wiretap Applications across Federal Judges
The degree to which discrimination causes the large racial disparities in the criminal justice system is a long-standing and difficult empirical question. This paper studies a decision in which the influence of race on prosecutors is directly observed: the process of obtaining judicial approval to conduct wiretap surveillance. The Department of Justice requires that federal prosecutors obtain i...
متن کاملCriminalizing Normal Adolescent Behavior in Communities of Color: the Role of Prosecutors in Juvenile Justice Reform
There is little dispute that racial disparities pervade the contemporary American juvenile justice system. The persistent overrepresentation of youth of color in the system suggests that scientifically supported notions of diminished culpability of youth are not applied consistently across races. Drawing from recent studies on implicit bias and the impact of race on perceptions of adolescent cu...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014